QPSG Section 1 — Core Grammar Pack
Cleaned and normalized from the provided Section 1 text. This pack contains modules 01–04 only.
1. 01_number_key_codes
{
"document_meta": {
"title": "01_number_key_codes.json.pdf",
"version": "1.0",
"source_basis": "Untitled 1.pdf",
"mode": "canon-preservation",
"format": "json-source-for-pdf"
},
"scope": "Extraction and preservation of the number-key-code system referenced in the source PDF for QPSG/C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.-style prompt application.",
"purpose": "Provide a modular JSON rule source for future PDF upload that preserves the source's digit-linked syntax roles while separating direct "source_quotes_or_clauses": [
"Numbering-word-syntax-grammar-keys: 1=adverb-syntax, 2=verb-syntax, 4=pronoun-syntax.",
"1=adverb-modifier; 2=verb / verb-noun / gerund / fraud references where stated; 3=adjective; 4=pronoun = no-no-no; 5=position / alphabet-letters "\"PAY TO\" = FUTURE-TIME = NOW-TIME-FOREVER-VOID.",
"The source repeatedly treats pronoun-adverb-verb, adverb-adjective-pronoun, adverb-verb-adverb-verb-adverb-verb, and adjective-pronoun syntax ],
"rules": [
{
"digit": "0",
"direct_source_role": [
"conjunction",
"and-command",
"or-option"
],
"operational_description": "Use for joining commands, alternatives, or conjunction-style connectors where the prompt requires an explicit joining "allowed_patterns": [
"and-command",
"or-option",
"explicit conjunction markers"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"unstated joins that hide relationships",
"ambiguous connector logic"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "implicit joining of clauses",
"to": "explicit conjunction or option marker"
}
],
"notes": [
"The source explicitly ties 0 to conjunction and command/option function."
]
},
{
"digit": "1",
"direct_source_role": [
"adverb-syntax",
"adverb-modifier"
],
"operational_description": "Flag adverb-like modifiers or source-classified adverb terms for review, especially where they contribute to allegedly "allowed_patterns": [
"source-marked adverb-syntax classifications",
"controlled modifier use when preserved as source evidence"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"adverb use inside source-flagged fraudulent combinations"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "unmarked modifier",
"to": "classified adverb-syntax marker when preserving source analysis"
}
],
"notes": [
"The source sometimes treats adverb syntax as part of disallowed combinations rather than as universally banned on its own."
]
},
{
"digit": "2",
"direct_source_role": [
"verb-syntax",
"verb",
"verb-noun",
"gerund"
],
"operational_description": "Flag verbs and verb-like constructions for source-style classification; preserve that the source often associates "allowed_patterns": [
"source-marked verb-syntax classifications",
"explicit verb-role labeling in examples"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"verb use embedded in source-flagged adverb-verb fraud patterns"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "ordinary unclassified action word",
"to": "classified verb-syntax element in analysis output"
}
],
"notes": [
"The source gives both neutral and negative treatment to verb forms depending on the syntax pattern."
]
},
{
"digit": "3",
"direct_source_role": [
"adjective",
"opinion/coloring where stated"
],
"operational_description": "Use for descriptive or quality terms when the source frames them as adjective-class terms, especially in analyses "allowed_patterns": [
"explicit adjective classification",
"descriptive terms preserved as source evidence"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"adjective use inside source-flagged adjective-pronoun combinations"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "unlabeled descriptive term",
"to": "adjective-class term in source-style analysis"
}
],
"notes": [
"The source associates adjectives with modification and opinion/coloring concerns in some passages."
]
},
{
"digit": "4",
"direct_source_role": [
"pronoun-syntax",
"pronoun = no-no-no"
],
"operational_description": "Flag pronouns as a defect or disallowed syntax class under the source model; prefer replacing pronouns with explicit "allowed_patterns": [
"pronoun detection in audit mode only"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"standalone pronoun use",
"pronoun-adverb-verb combinations",
"adjective-pronoun combinations",
"single-pronoun syntax"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "he / she / they / it / we / you",
"to": "explicit named party, claimant, person, vessel, or defined noun"
}
],
"notes": [
"This is the strongest and clearest prohibition posture in the source."
]
},
{
"digit": "5",
"direct_source_role": [
"position",
"alphabet-letters",
"word-spellings",
"definition-terms",
"operations"
],
"operational_description": "Use to anchor wording by position words, exact spellings, definitions, and operational phrasing.",
"allowed_patterns": [
"for",
"of",
"with",
"by",
"through",
"in",
"on",
"within",
"exact term spelling",
"defined terms"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"undefined placeholders",
"vague referents",
"positionless relation claims"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "vague noun relation",
"to": "explicit positional / definitional phrase"
}
],
"notes": [
"Elsewhere in the source, position is expanded with examples such as for, of, with, by, through, in, and on."
]
},
{
"digit": "6",
"direct_source_role": [
"lodial",
"ownership of the matter",
"equity"
],
"operational_description": "Use for ownership, title, equity, or lodial-claim language under the source model.",
"allowed_patterns": [
"lodial title",
"ownership of the matter",
"equity",
"land-title / value-title references"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"ownership claims with no identified matter",
"generic substitutes that erase lodial framing"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "ownership",
"to": "lodial / ownership-of-the-matter / equity phrasing where source-supported"
}
],
"notes": [
"The source connects this role to equity and title language."
]
},
{
"digit": "7",
"direct_source_role": [
"fact-contract operations"
],
"operational_description": "Use for fact-oriented contract or operation language that the source treats as non-fictional structure.",
"allowed_patterns": [
"fact-contract",
"fact-as-fact",
"fact-operations"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"fictional modifications presented as facts"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "fiction-marked language",
"to": "fact-contract operation language"
}
],
"notes": [
"This role is tied to factual operation posture rather than mere description."
]
},
{
"digit": "8",
"direct_source_role": [
"past-time-tense"
],
"operational_description": "Flag past-time-tense constructions when preserving or auditing source-style time treatment.",
"allowed_patterns": [
"explicit past-time references in source analysis"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"unexamined reliance on past-time authority when the prompt aims for now-time framing"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "past-time statement",
"to": "past-time-tense classified statement"
}
],
"notes": [
"The source repeatedly distinguishes past-time from now-time."
]
},
{
"digit": "9",
"direct_source_role": [
"future-time-tense",
"future-time-tense = fiction"
],
"operational_description": "Flag future-tense constructions as fictional or void under the source model and convert to now-time or present factual "allowed_patterns": [
"future-time detection in audit mode only"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"future-time promises treated as present fact",
"\"pay to\" / bearer-demand style future phrasing where source marks it void"
],
"transformations": [
{
"from": "will / shall / future-demand language",
"to": "now-time contract phrasing or present factual wording"
}
],
"notes": [
"The source explicitly says future-time-tense is fiction and gives examples of voiding future-oriented wording."
]
}
],
"allowed_patterns": [
"digit-to-role mapping 0 through 9",
"source-style classification of terms by number key",
"separation of direct source role from inferred operational prompt use",
"explicit notes when the source is stronger on prohibition than on replacement grammar"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"outside linguistic theory presented as source canon",
"modern grammar corrections that override source claims",
"invented digit meanings not grounded in the source PDF"
],
"transformations": [
{
"name": "classify_by_number_key",
"from": "unclassified words or phrases",
"to": "digit-linked syntax-role analysis"
},
{
"name": "pronoun_replacement_support",
"from": "pronoun-heavy wording",
"to": "explicit named party / role / noun wording"
},
{
"name": "future_to_now_time_support",
"from": "future-tense phrasing",
"to": "now-time or present factual phrasing"
}
],
"prompt_application": {
"input_type": "natural language or legal text",
"output_type": "qpsg-aligned structured text",
"priority_order": [
"identify digit-linked syntax roles when explicitly present or inferable from source examples",
"flag 4-class pronoun usage",
"flag 9-class future-time usage",
"anchor 5-class position / definition / spelling terms",
"preserve 6-class lodial / ownership language",
"prefer 7-class fact-contract operation framing when supported by source"
]
},
"examples": [
{
"example_id": 1,
"input": "\"WE THE PEOPLE\"",
"classified_output": [
"WE = 4 (pronoun-syntax, source-flagged)",
"THE = 1 or lodial/article support depending on source variant context",
"PEOPLE = 2 in a cited source example"
],
"note": "This preserves a source example pattern rather than asserting a universal grammar rule."
},
{
"example_id": 2,
"input": "\"PAY TO THE BEARER ON DEMAND\"",
"classified_output": [
"PAY = 9-linked future-time/void example context in source discussion",
"TO = positional support",
"THE = article/lodial support",
"BEARER = defined noun",
"ON = positional support",
"DEMAND = verb/noun context"
],
"note": "The source uses this kind of phrase to illustrate future-time-tense voiding."
},
{
"example_id": 3,
"input": "\"claim of the lodial-land-title\"",
"classified_output": [
"claim = 7 fact-contract operation support",
"of / the = 5-position and article support",
"lodial-land-title = 6 ownership/equity/title support"
],
"note": "This is a source-style example for prompt-use modeling."
}
],
"notes": [
"This module preserves source claims without validating them.",
"Some digit roles appear directly in one compact inventory, while other supporting meanings are distributed across nearby pages and examples.",
"Article treatment is not perfectly stable in the source. In one place, articles are grouped with lodial support; elsewhere the digit inventory ],
"limitations": [
"The source PDF is internally inconsistent in places and does not provide a complete formal grammar.",
"Not every digit receives the same level of definition detail across pages.",
"Several operational descriptions here are implementation support derived from direct source phrases, not verbatim source formulas."
]
}
2. 02_pronoun_restrictions
{
"document_meta": {
"title": "02_pronoun_restrictions.json.pdf",
"version": "1.0",
"source_basis": "Untitled 1.pdf",
"mode": "canon-preservation",
"format": "json-source-for-pdf"
},
"scope": "Preserve source statements that classify pronoun usage as defective or prohibited within the source's parse-syntax framework, then convert "purpose": "Provide a compact JSON rule module that lets future prompts detect pronoun-centered constructions, flag them as source-disallowed patterns, "source_quotes_or_clauses": [
{
"type": "direct-source-short-quote",
"text": "4=PRONOUN=NO-NO-NO",
"role": "core prohibition marker"
},
{
"type": "direct-source-short-quote",
"text": "4=PRONOUN(NO-NO-NO)",
"role": "number-key restatement"
},
{
"type": "direct-source-short-quote",
"text": "4=pronoun-syntax",
"role": "compressed number-key label"
},
{
"type": "direct-source-paraphrase",
"text": "The source associates pronoun/adverb/verb syntax with fiction-style communication and modification of nouns.",
"role": "supporting source posture"
}
],
"rules": [
{
"id": "PR-01",
"label": "number-key-pronoun-prohibition",
"source_basis": "direct-source",
"rule": "When the source's number-key system marks a word or construction as pronoun-coded, treat it as disallowed or defective within this },
{
"id": "PR-02",
"label": "explicit-reference-preference",
"source_basis": "inferred-implementation",
"rule": "Replace pronouns with the explicit person, claimant, title, document, vessel, object, or named party previously identified in the sentence },
{
"id": "PR-03",
"label": "anti-vagueness-anchor",
"source_basis": "inferred-implementation",
"rule": "If a pronoun obscures who acts, owns, claims, pays, signs, files, or authorizes, rewrite the phrase so the actor and object are named },
{
"id": "PR-04",
"label": "repeat-the-noun-not-the-pronoun",
"source_basis": "inferred-implementation",
"rule": "Prefer repeating a defined noun phrase over using he, she, it, they, this, that, these, or those when the repeated term keeps the claim }
],
"allowed_patterns": [
"explicit claimant names",
"repeated role titles such as claimant, person, postmaster-banker, corporation, document-contract-court-port vessel",
"defined document references such as this contract, this certificate, this claim, this payment, when the object is immediately named",
"named-party continuity across numbered claim lines",
"source-style repetition of exact nouns for clarity"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"standalone personal pronouns that replace the acting party",
"demonstrative pronouns with no immediately named object",
"plural pronouns that blur who is bound by the claim",
"pronoun chains that require inference from earlier prose",
"mixed noun-to-pronoun switching inside a single numbered claim"
],
"transformations": [
{
"id": "TR-01",
"pattern": "he / she / they / it + action",
"action": "replace with the exact named actor or role title",
"example_pattern": "he signed the claim",
"example_output": "the claimant signed this claim"
},
{
"id": "TR-02",
"pattern": "this / that / these / those used alone",
"action": "append the named object or replace with the full object phrase",
"example_pattern": "this is authorized",
"example_output": "this payment is authorized"
},
{
"id": "TR-03",
"pattern": "pronoun after a previously named document or certificate",
"action": "repeat the document term instead of using it",
"example_pattern": "it is void of liens",
"example_output": "this gold-certificate is void of liens"
},
{
"id": "TR-04",
"pattern": "they + collective duty or claim",
"action": "name the persons, corporations, or parties directly",
"example_pattern": "they accepted the payment",
"example_output": "the contract-states-corporation accepted this payment"
}
],
"prompt_application": {
"input_type": "natural language or legal text",
"output_type": "qpsg-aligned structured text",
"priority_order": [
"identify explicit nouns and roles already present",
"flag pronouns or pronoun-like placeholders",
"replace each pronoun with the nearest correct named actor or object",
"prefer source-style repeated nouns over ambiguous shorthand",
"keep the final line compatible with numbered-claim formatting"
]
},
"examples": [
{
"type": "before_after",
"before": "He filed it with the court.",
"after": "The claimant filed this claim with the document-contract-court."
},
{
"type": "before_after",
"before": "They made the payment and it was accepted.",
"after": "The contract-states-corporation made this payment and this payment was accepted."
},
{
"type": "before_after",
"before": "~1 FOR THIS PERSON IS WITH THE CLAIM THAT HE AUTHORIZED IT.",
"after": "~1 FOR THIS PERSON IS WITH THE CLAIM THAT THIS PERSON AUTHORIZED THIS CLAIM."
}
],
"notes": [
"The source gives a strong prohibition posture against pronouns but does not provide a full replacement grammar for every English sentence shape.",
"This module preserves source posture first and adds a minimal implementation layer so prompts can use the rule consistently.",
"Demonstratives such as this, that, these, and those are operationally risky when the object is omitted; when the object is named immediately, ],
"limitations": [
"This module describes the source framework only; it does not validate the source claims as universal grammar or law.",
"The source is internally stylized and sometimes fragmentary, so several transformation rules are implementation inferences rather than direct "Pronoun detection in real prompts may require judgment when a word functions as determiner in one context and pronoun in another."
]
}
3. 03_tense_rules
{
"document_meta": {
"title": "03_tense_rules.json.pdf",
"version": "1.0",
"source_basis": "Untitled 1.pdf",
"mode": "canon-preservation",
"format": "json-source-for-pdf"
},
"scope": "Preserve source treatment of time and tense in the uploaded PDF, especially the source-coded distinction between past-time tense and future-"purpose": "Provide a reusable JSON module that future prompts can apply when identifying, flagging, and transforming tense-related language into "source_quotes_or_clauses": [
"8=PAST-TIME-TENSE",
"9=FUTURE-TIME-TENSE=FICTION",
"future-tense is with the void by a now-time-contract",
"TO2-future-time-=void",
"TO1-future-time",
"TO1-future-time-void"
],
"rules": [
{
"id": "TR-01",
"label": "past_time_tense_key",
"source_status": "direct-source",
"rule": "Number key 8 is assigned to past-time tense.",
"operational_description": "When the source explicitly frames wording as completed, prior, historical, or already-autographed/performed, classify },
{
"id": "TR-02",
"label": "future_time_tense_key",
"source_status": "direct-source",
"rule": "Number key 9 is assigned to future-time tense and is labeled fiction.",
"operational_description": "Flag projected, promised, speculative, or not-yet-performed wording as source-flagged future-time fiction unless },
{
"id": "TR-03",
"label": "future_void_by_now_time_contract",
"source_status": "direct-source",
"rule": "The source states that future tense is void by a now-time contract.",
"operational_description": "Prefer present, now-time, existing-duty, or completed-performance phrasing over open-ended future commitments."
},
{
"id": "TR-04",
"label": "future_marker_detection",
"source_status": "inferred-implementation",
"rule": "Operationally flag common future markers when building prompt transformations.",
"operational_description": "Markers such as will, shall, going to, later, soon, next, projected, planned, and to+future-time should be reviewed },
{
"id": "TR-05",
"label": "now_time_recast_preference",
"source_status": "inferred-implementation",
"rule": "Recast future statements into now-time contract, present duty, or already-existing fact claim wording where possible.",
"operational_description": "Transform speculative language into current claim, current duty, current fact, or completed record language."
}
],
"allowed_patterns": [
"now-time contract phrasing",
"present-duty or present-claim wording",
"completed-performance wording",
"historical or archive-based past-time statements",
"source-style explicit date markers when tied to completed events"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"open-ended future promises with no now-time anchor",
"future-time phrasing treated as binding fact without present contract basis",
"will/shall constructions left uncorrected in source-style output",
"projected or speculative wording presented as completed fact"
],
"transformations": [
{
"type": "future_to_now_time",
"pattern": "The claimant will send the document.",
"result": "FOR THE CLAIMANT IS WITH THE SENDING OF THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT BY THE NOW-TIME-CLAIM."
},
{
"type": "future_to_present_duty",
"pattern": "The party shall perform payment next week.",
"result": "FOR THE PARTY IS WITH THE PAYMENT-DUTY OF THE CONTRACT AT THE NOW-TIME-CLAIM OF THE PERFORMANCE."
},
{
"type": "future_projection_to_current_record",
"pattern": "The damages will continue in the future.",
"result": "FOR THE DAMAGE-CLAIM IS WITH THE CONTINUING-LOSS RECORD AT THE NOW-TIME-CLAIM."
},
{
"type": "past_event_preservation",
"pattern": "The agreement was signed on the date.",
"result": "FOR THE AGREEMENT IS WITH THE AUTOGRAPHING ON THE DATE-[completed-event record]."
}
],
"prompt_application": {
"input_type": "natural language or legal text",
"output_type": "qpsg-aligned structured text",
"priority_order": [
"detect explicit future markers",
"flag source-coded future-time fiction posture",
"determine whether wording can be recast into now-time contract",
"preserve legitimate past-time record statements",
"emit transformed output in source-aligned style"
]
},
"examples": [
{
"before": "The trustee will review the contract tomorrow.",
"after": "FOR THE TRUSTEE IS WITH THE REVIEW OF THE CONTRACT-DOCUMENT BY THE NOW-TIME-CLAIM."
},
{
"before": "The parties shall transfer title later.",
"after": "FOR THE PARTIES ARE WITH THE TITLE-TRANSFER-DUTY OF THE NOW-TIME-CONTRACT-CLAIM."
},
{
"before": "The court record was filed on the date.",
"after": "FOR THE COURT-RECORD IS WITH THE FILING ON THE DATE-[completed-past-time record]."
}
],
"notes": [
"The strongest direct source anchors are the explicit number-key mapping for 8 and 9 and the clause stating that future tense is void by a now-"Some visible source examples mix tense treatment with broader syntax coding; this module isolates only the tense-related layer.",
"Example rewrites are implementation examples derived from source posture rather than verbatim source sentences."
],
"limitations": [
"The source gives a strong anti-future-tense posture but does not provide a complete formal grammar for every English tense construction.",
"Operational future-marker detection is an inferred implementation layer and not a complete direct-source list.",
"This module preserves source claims only and does not validate them as universal linguistic or legal rules."
]
}
4. 04_position_definition_terms
{
"document_meta": {
"title": "04_position_definition_terms.json.pdf",
"version": "1.0",
"source_basis": "Untitled 1.pdf",
"mode": "canon-preservation",
"format": "json-source-for-pdf"
},
"scope": "Preserve the source rule that number key 5 governs position, alphabet letters, word spellings, definition terms, and operations, plus "purpose": "Provide a reusable JSON source module for future prompts that need to preserve or apply source-style position and definition-term control.",
"source_quotes_or_clauses": [
{
"type": "direct-source",
"text": "5=POSITION = ALPHABET-LETTERS, WORD-SPELLINGS, DEFINITION-TERMS AND OPERATIONS.",
"source_reference": "Untitled 1.pdf"
},
{
"type": "direct-source",
"text": ":POSITION = For, of, with, by, in, on, within.",
"source_reference": "Untitled 1.pdf"
},
{
"type": "direct-source",
"text": ":PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR: For the WORD-MEANINGS of the PLACMENT ARE within the CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR "source_reference": "Untitled 1.pdf"
},
{
"type": "direct-source",
"text": "FOR THE POSITION AS A FEDERAL-POSTAL-JUDGE OF THE HAWAI'I IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE-CLAIM...",
"source_reference": "Untitled 1.pdf"
},
{
"type": "direct-source",
"text": "FOR THE POSITION OF THE TRANSLATION-MEDIUM IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE AND CO-OPERATION BY THE DISTRICT-COURT...",
"source_reference": "Untitled 1.pdf"
}
],
"rules": [
{
"rule_id": "PDT-01",
"type": "direct-source",
"name": "number_key_5_scope",
"statement": "Number key 5 governs position, alphabet letters, word spellings, definition terms, and operations."
},
{
"rule_id": "PDT-02",
"type": "direct-source",
"name": "position_terms_are_explicit",
"statement": "Position is expressed through explicit positional terms such as For, of, with, by, in, on, within."
},
{
"rule_id": "PDT-03",
"type": "direct-source",
"name": "word_meaning_depends_on_placement",
"statement": "Word meanings are tied to placement within the sentence structure."
},
{
"rule_id": "PDT-04",
"type": "inferred-operational",
"name": "prefer_named_positions",
"statement": "Prompts should prefer explicit named positions, roles, and relation terms rather than vague references."
},
{
"rule_id": "PDT-05",
"type": "inferred-operational",
"name": "prefer_defined_terms",
"statement": "Prompts should anchor key nouns with explicit definitions, spellings, or role labels when possible."
},
{
"rule_id": "PDT-06",
"type": "inferred-operational",
"name": "position_rule_fires_before_styling",
"statement": "When transforming text, position and definition anchoring should occur before visual formatting or compound-term expansion."
}
],
"allowed_patterns": [
"Explicit positional markers: For, of, with, by, in, on, within",
"Named roles: claimant, judge, translation-medium, district-court",
"Defined terms introduced with labels such as :POSITION, :PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR, :LODIAL",
"Exact or repeated spellings where term precision matters",
"Sentences that state who/what occupies a role or position"
],
"disallowed_patterns": [
"Unanchored vague referents without role or position",
"Undefined placeholder nouns where the source expects a defined term",
"Loose paraphrase that removes positional links between terms",
"Operational text that obscures who acts, what the term is, or where it is placed"
],
"transformations": [
{
"type": "inferred-operational",
"from": "The judge knows the method.",
"to": "FOR THE POSITION AS A JUDGE IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE METHOD."
},
{
"type": "inferred-operational",
"from": "The translation role works with the court.",
"to": "FOR THE POSITION OF THE TRANSLATION-MEDIUM IS WITH THE CO-OPERATION BY THE COURT."
},
{
"type": "inferred-operational",
"from": "These words have meaning in context.",
"to": "FOR THE WORD-MEANINGS OF THE PLACEMENT ARE WITHIN THE SENTENCE-MEANING."
}
],
"prompt_application": {
"input_type": "natural language or legal text",
"output_type": "qpsg-aligned structured text with explicit positional and definition anchoring",
"priority_order": [
"Identify vague nouns, roles, or relations",
"Replace them with explicit position terms where source-grounded",
"Anchor key words through labels, spellings, or defined-term framing",
"Preserve placement-based meaning relationships",
"Only after that, apply later formatting modules"
]
},
"examples": [
{
"label": "example_1",
"input": "The court position requires knowledge.",
"output": "FOR THE POSITION OF THE COURT IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE-CLAIM."
},
{
"label": "example_2",
"input": "Meaning depends on word placement.",
"output": "FOR THE WORD-MEANINGS OF THE PLACEMENT ARE WITHIN THE SENTENCE-MEANING."
},
{
"label": "example_3",
"input": "Use exact terms and spellings.",
"output": "FOR THE POSITION OF THE WORD-SPELLINGS AND DEFINITION-TERMS ARE WITH THE OPERATIONS."
}
],
"notes": [
"The source gives a compact explicit rule for number key 5 and only partial elaboration elsewhere.",
"The list of position words is directly sourced from the PDF.",
"Some application guidance in this module is inferred from the source posture rather than explicitly formalized as a complete grammar."
],
"limitations": [
"The source does not provide a full formal algorithm for position analysis.",
"The source does not define exhaustive spelling or definition-term procedures.",
"Operational replacements in examples are implementation support, not verbatim canon quotations."
]
}
